Title of article
The influence of different error estimates in the detection of post-operative cognitive dysfunction using reliable change indices with correction for practice effects
Author/Authors
Matthew S. Lewis، نويسنده , , Paul Maruff، نويسنده , , Brendan S. Silbert، نويسنده , , Lis A. Evered، نويسنده , , David A. Scott، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages
7
From page
421
To page
427
Abstract
The reliable change index (RCI) expresses change relative to its associated error, and is useful in the identification of post-operative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). This paper examines four common RCIs that each account for error in different ways. Three rules incorporate a constant correction for practice effects and are contrasted with the standard RCI that had no correction for practice. These rules are applied to 160 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery who completed neuropsychological assessments preoperatively and 1 week post-operatively using error and reliability data from a comparable healthy non-surgical control group. The rules all identify POCD in a similar proportion of patients, but the use of the within subject standard deviation, expressing the effects of random error, as an error estimate is a theoretically appropriate denominator when a constant error correction, removing the effects of systematic error, is deducted from the numerator in a RCI.
Keywords
Neuropsychological assessment , statistics , Post-operative cognitive dysfunction , coronary artery bypass graft surgery , Reliable change index
Journal title
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Serial Year
2006
Journal title
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Record number
516796
Link To Document