Title of article :
Does the emotional go/no-go task really measure behavioral inhibition?: Convergence with measures on a non-emotional analog
Author/Authors :
Kurt P. Schulz، نويسنده , , Jin Fan، نويسنده , , Olga Magidina، نويسنده , , David J. Marks، نويسنده , , Bella Hahn، نويسنده , , Jeffrey M. Halperin، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Pages :
10
From page :
151
To page :
160
Abstract :
This study tested the convergence of behavioral inhibition measures across emotional and non-emotional versions of the same go/no-go task in 85 college students. The two tasks differed only in the stimuli used for trial cues (i.e., circles versus facial expressions). Moderate correlations (r = .51–.56) between commission errors across the emotional and non-emotional tasks support the construct validity of behavioral inhibition. Further, parametric manipulation of preceding context had comparable effects on performance on the two tasks. Responses were slower and more variable, commission errors were more numerous, and perceptual sensitivity was lower on the emotional than the non-emotional task. A bias for happy faces on the emotional task resulted in faster responses and more commission errors for happy than sad faces despite marginally greater sensitivity for the latter. These results suggest that the basic neuropsychological constructs of the original go/no-go task were preserved in the emotional adaptation.
Keywords :
Emotional bias , Go/no-go task , Construct validity , behavioral inhibition
Journal title :
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Serial Year :
2007
Journal title :
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Record number :
516849
Link To Document :
بازگشت