Title of article :
Tracing of proximal lumbosacral nerve conduction – a comparison of simultaneous magneto – and electroneurography
Author/Authors :
Bruno-Marcel Mackert، نويسنده , , Martin Burghoff، نويسنده , , Lars-Henning Hiss، نويسنده , , Lutz Trahms، نويسنده , , Gabriel Curio، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2001
Abstract :
Objective: The reconstruction of nerve impulse conduction along proximal lumbosacral plexus and nerve roots is compared using simultaneous magneto- and electroneurography.
Methods: In 3 healthy subjects the left tibial nerve was electrostimulated at the ankle. Evoked magnetic fields and electric surface potentials were measured simultaneously over the lumbosacral spine using a multichannel SQUID-detector with a planar measuring area and 25 surface electrodes covering a comparable area centered around L4. Based on either magnetic field or electric potential maps the depolarization front of the evoked compound action currents (CAC) was spatio-temporally reconstructed using a simple equivalent current dipole model in a half-space volume conductor.
Results: The mean signal-to-noise ratio in the magnetic (electric) recordings was around 4 (8). Yet, the localization quality for the propagating CAC was lower for electric than magnetic recordings. The local nerve conduction velocity was around 47 m/s (calculated from magnetic data), but fluctuated unphysiologically for electric data.
Conclusion: In comparison to electroneurography, an anatomically reasonable localization of evoked compound action currents propagating in lumbosacral roots can be obtained by magnetoneurography.
Keywords :
Superconducting quantum interferencedevice , Surface potential , Lumbosacral nerve roots , Magnetoneurography , Electroneurography , Magnetic ®eld
Journal title :
Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal title :
Clinical Neurophysiology