• Title of article

    Emergent EEG in clinical practice

  • Author/Authors

    Julien Praline، نويسنده , , Jéléna Grujic، نويسنده , , Philippe Corcia، نويسنده , , Brigitte Lucas، نويسنده , , Caroline Hommet، نويسنده , , Alain Autret، نويسنده , , Bertrand de Toffol، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
  • Pages
    7
  • From page
    2149
  • To page
    2155
  • Abstract
    Objective Emergency situations require a rapid and precise diagnostic approach. However, the exact role and value of the electroencephalogram (EEG) in emergent conditions have yet to be clearly defined. Our objective was to determine why clinicians order an emergency EEG, to assess to what extent it helps establish a correct diagnosis and to evaluate the result it has on subsequent patient management. Methods We studied all successive emergency EEGs ordered during a 3-month period in our institution. We analyzed the reasons why each EEG was ordered and interviewed the prescribing clinicians in order to determine the impact the result of the EEG had on the diagnosis and subsequent therapeutic management. Results We prospectively studied a total of 111 consecutive recordings. The main reasons for ordering an emergent EEG were: suspected cerebral death (21%), non-convulsive status epilepticus (19.7%), subtle status epilepticus (14%) and follow-up of convulsive status epilepticus (11.2%). In 77.5% of the cases the clinicians considered that the EEG contributed to making the diagnosis and that it helped confirm a clinically-suspected diagnosis in 36% of the cases. When subtle status epilepticus (SSE) or non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) was suspected, the diagnosis was confirmed in 45% and 43.3% of the cases, respectively. In 22.2% of the requests involving follow-up of convulsive status epilepticus after initial treatment, the EEG demonstrated persistent status epilepticus. It resulted in a change in patient treatment in 37.8% of all the cases. When the EEG helped establish the diagnosis, patient treatment was subsequently modified in 46.6% of the cases. Conclusions This prospective study confirms the value of an emergent EEG in certain specific clinical contexts: the management of convulsive status epilepticus following initial treatment or to rule out subtle status epilepticus. An emergent EEG can also be ordered if one suspects the existence of non-convulsive status epilepticus when a patient presents with mental confusion or altered wakefulness after first looking for the specific signs suggesting this diagnostic hypothesis. Significance After 50 years of development and use in daily practice, the EEG remains a dependable, inexpensive and useful diagnostic tool in a number of clearly-defined emergency situations.
  • Keywords
    EEG , emergency , Epilepsy , diagnosis , status epilepticus , Confusion , coma
  • Journal title
    Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Serial Year
    2007
  • Journal title
    Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Record number

    524201