Title of article :
Randomized comparison of cilostazol versus ticlopidine hydrochloride for antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation for prevention of late restenosis
Author/Authors :
Hirotoshi Kamishirado، نويسنده , , Teruo Inoue، نويسنده , , Keiichi Mizoguchi، نويسنده , , Toshihiko Uchida، نويسنده , , Toshiyuki Nakata، نويسنده , , Masashi Sakuma، نويسنده , , Kan Takayanagi، نويسنده , , Shigenori Morooka، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
Pages :
6
From page :
303
To page :
308
Abstract :
Background Cilostazol is a newly developed antiplatelet drug that has been widely applied for clinical use. Its antiplatelet action appears to be mainly related to inhibition of intracellular phosphodiesterase activity. Recently, cilostazol has been used for antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation. However, its evaluation has not been established yet. Methods This prospective randomized trial was designed to investigate the efficacy of cilostazol for the prevention of late restenosis and acute or subacute stent thrombosis in comparison with ticlopidine hydrochloride. One hundred thirty consecutive patients, scheduled for elective coronary stenting, were randomly assigned to receive oral aspirin (81 mg/day) plus ticlopidine hydrochloride therapy (200 mg/day; group I) or aspirin plus cilostazol therapy (200 mg/day; group II). These medications were started at least 2 days before coronary intervention and continued until follow-up coronary angiography was performed 6 months later. Results Subacute stent thrombosis was observed in 2 patients of group I but in no patients of group II. Major cardiac events were similarly present in both groups. Elevated transaminase levels were observed more frequently in group I than in group II (P < .05). Each of the quantitative coronary angiography variables before and immediately after coronary stenting were similar in both groups. At follow-up angiography, however, late lumen loss (0.69 ± 0.79 mm vs 0.28 ± 0.40 mm; P < .01) and loss index (0.42 ± 0.56 vs 0.16 ± 0.27; P < .01) were smaller in group II than in group I. Restenosis rate (13% vs 31%; P < .05) and target lesion revascularization rate (7% vs 21%; P < .05) were both lower in group II than in group I. Conclusion Aspirin plus cilostazol therapy may be an effective regimen for prevention of not only stent thrombosis but also restenosis. (Am Heart J 2002;144:303-8.)
Journal title :
American Heart Journal
Serial Year :
2002
Journal title :
American Heart Journal
Record number :
532863
Link To Document :
بازگشت