Title of article :
Randomized double-blind safety study of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with tirofiban and aspirin: The ACUTE II study
Author/Authors :
Marc Cohen، نويسنده , , Pierre Théroux، نويسنده , , Steven Borzak، نويسنده , , Martin J. Frey، نويسنده , , Harvey D. White، نويسنده , , W. Van Mieghem، نويسنده , , Fred Senatore، نويسنده , , Joy Lis، نويسنده , , Robin Mukherjee، نويسنده , , Kathy Harris، نويسنده , , Frederique Bigonzi، نويسنده , , on behalf of the ACUTE II Investigators، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
Pages :
8
From page :
470
To page :
477
Abstract :
Background In comparison with treatment with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and aspirin (ASA), both tirofiban administered with UFH and ASA, and enoxaparin plus ASA have shown superiority in reducing cardiac ischemic events in patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Replacing UFH with enoxaparin when tirofiban is administered to patients may offer further therapeutic benefit, but could also increase bleeding. Objective Our objective was to provide estimates of the frequency of bleeding complications, as defined by means of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction(TIMI) group, and collect data on clinical efficacy of the combination of tirofiban with enoxaparin plus ASA. Methods Five hundred twenty-five patients with UA/NSTEMI were treated with tirofiban coadministered with ASA and randomized to receive either UFH (n = 210) or enoxaparin (n = 315). Therapy was administered for 24 to 96 hours. Bleeding incidences were assessed until 24 hours after trial therapy was discontinued; other clinical outcomes were assessed for as long as 30 days. Results The total bleeding rate (TIMI major + minor + loss-no-site) for the UFH group versus the enoxaparin group was 4.8% vs 3.5% (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, CI 0.6-3.4). The TIMI major and minor bleeding rates for the UFH versus the enoxaparin groups were 1.0% versus 0.3% (OR 3.0, CI 0.3-33.8) and 4.3% versus 2.5% (OR 1.7, CI 0.7-4.6). There was an increase in nuisance cutaneous and oral bleeds (<50 mL of blood loss) in the enoxaparin group. Death or myocardial infarction occurred with similar frequency in the 2 groups (9.0% vs 9.2%). However, refractory ischemia requiring urgent revascularization and rehospitalization because of unstable angina occurred more frequently in the UFH group (4.3% vs 0.6% and 7.1% vs 1.6%, respectively). Conclusions Combination therapy with tirofiban plus enoxaparin appears safe, relative to therapy with tirofiban plus UFH. (Am Heart J 2002;144:470-7.)
Journal title :
American Heart Journal
Serial Year :
2002
Journal title :
American Heart Journal
Record number :
532890
Link To Document :
بازگشت