• Title of article

    Additional stenting promotes intimal proliferation and compromises the results of intravascular radiation therapy: an intravascular ultrasound study

  • Author/Authors

    Edouard Cheneau، نويسنده , , Zhiyong Wu ، نويسنده , , Laurent Leborgne، نويسنده , , Andrew E. Ajani، نويسنده , , Neil Weissman، نويسنده , , Augusto D. Pichard، نويسنده , , Lowell F. Satler، نويسنده , , Kenneth M. Kent، نويسنده , , Gary Mintz، نويسنده , , Ron Waksman، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
  • Pages
    4
  • From page
    142
  • To page
    145
  • Abstract
    Background Vascular brachytherapy (VBT) reduces in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, additional stenting at the time of radiation may be associated with a worse outcome. Methods and results Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was performed after VBT and at 6 months follow-up in 79 native artery ISR patients treated with γ-radiation who participated in the Washington Radiation for In-Stent restenosis Trial (WRIST), Gamma-1, and Angiorad Radiation Technology for In-Stent restenosis Trial in Coronaries (ARTISTIC) trials. Patients were treated with 192Ir at 14 or 15 Gy at 2 mm from the source. Additional stents were used to treat the ISR lesions in 45 patients; these patients were then compared with the 34 patients treated without restenting. Paired measurements included stent, lumen, and intimal hyperplasia volumes. After the VBT procedure, intimal hyperplasia volume was smaller in the group treated with additional stents (54 ± 33 mm3 vs 34 ± 33 mm3, P = .012), but minimal lumen area was similar between the 2 groups (4.3 ± 1.5 mm2 vs 4.7 ± 1.4 mm2 respectively, P = NS). Between the time of the VBT procedure and follow-up, intimal hyperplasia volume increased by 27 ± 19 mm3 in the restented group and by 9 ± 21 mm3 in the group treated without additional stents (P = .014). At 6 months, intimal volume was similar in the 2 groups, but minimal lumen area was slightly smaller in the group treated with additional stents (3.4 ± 1.8 mm2 vs 4.2 ± 1.7 mm2, P = .053). Patients treated with additional stents had more target lesion revascularizations than the group treated without additional stents (38% vs 15%, P = .02). Conclusions Additional stenting reduces intimal hyperplasia within the stents acutely. However, it compromises the benefit of VBT by promoting higher intimal regrowth within months after radiation.
  • Journal title
    American Heart Journal
  • Serial Year
    2003
  • Journal title
    American Heart Journal
  • Record number

    533203