Title of article
Multislice spiral computed tomographic angiography of coronary arteries in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: An effective filter before catheter angiography?
Author/Authors
Ralph Haberl، نويسنده , , Janine Tittus، نويسنده , , Eike B?hme، نويسنده , , Andreas Czernik، نويسنده , , Barbara Maria Richartz، نويسنده , , Jürgen Buck، نويسنده , , Peter Steinbigler، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages
8
From page
1112
To page
1119
Abstract
Background
Despite impressive image quality, it is unclear if noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography (CT) is powerful enough to act as a filter before invasive angiography (INV-A) in symptomatic patients.
Methods and Results
We therefore studied 133 consecutive symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) and an indication for INV-A (chest pain and signs of ischemia in conventional stress tests). Patients with known CAD, acute coronary syndrome, or a calcium volume score >1000 were excluded. In all patients, both INV-A and multislice CT angiography (MSCT-A) (Philips MX 8000 multislice spiral CT, scan time 250 milliseconds, slice thickness 1.3 mm, 120 mL of contrast agent, 4 mL/s, retrospective gating) were directly compared by 2 independent investigators using the American Heart Association 15-segment model. Altogether, we studied 1596 segments, 74% had diagnostic image quality. Multislice CT angiography correctly identified 68 significant stenoses of the 75 stenoses seen with INV-A (sensitivity 91%). In 945 of 1185 diagnostic segments, stenosis could correctly be ruled out with MSCT-A. There were 3 times more stenoses seen with MSCT-A compared with INV-A (positive predictive value 29%) mainly because of misclassification of nonobstructive plaques as stenosis. The per-patient analysis allowed to exclude significant CAD in 42 (32%) of 133 patients. In only 6 of 53 patients, MSCT-A failed to detect significant stenosis, 4 of those were in small segments not requiring intervention. Calcium scoring alone was less suited as a filter before angiography: 25 patients (18% of study group) had a calcium score = 0, and 8 of these patients turned out to have significant stenoses.
Conclusion
Multislice CT angiography, but not calcium scoring alone, offers promise to reduce the number of INV-A in symptomatic patients with suspected CAD by up to one third with minimal risk for the patient.
Journal title
American Heart Journal
Serial Year
2005
Journal title
American Heart Journal
Record number
533982
Link To Document