• Title of article

    Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease

  • Author/Authors

    Carlo Briguori، نويسنده , , Antonio Colombo، نويسنده , , Flavio Airoldi، نويسنده , , Amelia Focaccio*، نويسنده , , Ioannis Iakovou، نويسنده , , Alaide Chieffo، نويسنده , , Iassen Michev، نويسنده , , Matteo Montorfano، نويسنده , , Erminio Bonizzoni، نويسنده , , Bruno Ricciardelli*، نويسنده , , Gerolama Condorelli، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
  • Pages
    7
  • From page
    807
  • To page
    813
  • Abstract
    Background Restenosis rate is lower after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation than after bare metal stent (BS) implantation. We evaluated the impact of SES implantation on immediate and 12-month outcome in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD). Methods From April 2002 to September 2003, 100 consecutive diabetic patients with MVD without previous myocardial revascularization underwent successful elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with SES on native coronary arteries at our institutions. A group (n = 122) of consecutive diabetic patients with MVD treated with BS implantation (BS group) for de novo lesions was selected from our database and matched with the SES group. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) during hospital stay and at follow-up included nonfatal myocardial infarction, death, bypass surgery, and re-PCI. Results At 12 ± 4 months, MACEs occurred in 25% of patients in the SES group and in 44% of those in the BS group (P = .003, OR .72, 95% CI 0.57-0.91). Need for repeat intervention (re-PCI or bypass surgery) occurred in 17% of patients in the SES group and in 41% of those in the BS group (P < .001, OR .67, 95% CI 0.52-0.86). No significant difference in the rate of death and myocardial infarction was observed. In the SES group, the independent predictors of MACEs at follow-up were premature clopidogrel discontinuation (hazard ratio 20.62, 95% CI 1.60-264.97, P = .020) and chronic renal insufficiency (hazard ratio 4.73, 95% CI 1.99-11.25, P = .0004). Conclusions As compared with BS implantation, SES implantation favorably influences outcome in diabetic patients with MVD, mainly by reducing the need for new revascularization.
  • Journal title
    American Heart Journal
  • Serial Year
    2005
  • Journal title
    American Heart Journal
  • Record number

    534123