• Title of article

    Underuse of evidence-based treatment partly explains the worse clinical outcome in diabetic patients with acute coronary syndromes

  • Author/Authors

    Raymond T. Yan، نويسنده , , Andrew T. Yan، نويسنده , , Mary Tan، نويسنده , , Darren K. McGuire، نويسنده , , Lawrence Leiter، نويسنده , , David H. Fitchett، نويسنده , , Claude Lauzon، نويسنده , , Kevin Lai، نويسنده , , Chi-Ming Chow، نويسنده , , Anatoly Langer، نويسنده , , Shaun G. Goodman and for the Canadian Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry Investigators، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
  • Pages
    8
  • From page
    676
  • To page
    683
  • Abstract
    Background Diabetes-related differences in treatment and clinical outcome of patients across the entire spectrum of acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) have potential clinical implications but have not been well studied. Methods The multicenter, prospective, Canadian ACS Registry enrolled 4578 patients hospitalized for ACS between 1999 and 2001 across 9 provinces in Canada. We compared baseline characteristics, in-hospital and post-discharge treatments, and clinical outcome of diabetic and non-diabetic patients. The impact of diabetes on use of thrombolytic therapy and coronary revascularization; and the independent association between diabetes, treatments, and diabetes-treatment interactions on outcome were examined. Results Diabetic patients with ACS had more cardiovascular risk factors and higher-risk clinical presentation. They paradoxically received less evidence-based medications in-hospital, at discharge, and at 1-year. Although diabetes independently predicted higher 1-year mortality (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.15-1.87; P = .002) after adjustment for validated prognosticators, it was also an independent predictor of not receiving thrombolytic therapy (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.95; P = .021) and coronary revascularization (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59-0.82; P < .001). These underused therapies were all independently associated with reduced 1-year mortality, with no significant diabetes-related treatment-outcome heterogeneity. Importantly, diabetes remained an independent adverse prognosticator even after further adjustment for these differences in treatment. Conclusions Evidence-based therapies are underused in the contemporary management of diabetic patients with ACS, which partly explains their worse outcome. Diabetes should be considered a high-risk feature in ACS risk stratification that encourages more intensive treatments. Continued efforts to promote adherence to existing proven therapies and to develop novel treatment strategies targeting diabetes-specific cardiovascular pathophysiology are imperative to improve their adverse prognosis.
  • Journal title
    American Heart Journal
  • Serial Year
    2006
  • Journal title
    American Heart Journal
  • Record number

    534591