• Title of article

    Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial of β-blocker therapy (atenolol) versus angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy (losartan) in individuals with Marfan syndrome

  • Author/Authors

    Ronald V. Lacro، نويسنده , , Harry C. Dietz، نويسنده , , Lisa M. Wruck، نويسنده , , Timothy J. Bradley، نويسنده , , Steven D. Colan، نويسنده , , Richard B. Devereux، نويسنده , , Gloria L. Klein، نويسنده , , Jennifer S. Li، نويسنده , , L. LuAnn Minich، نويسنده , , Stephen M. Paridon، نويسنده , , Gail D. Pearson، نويسنده , , Beth F. Printz، نويسنده , , Reed E. Pyeritz، نويسنده , , Elizabeth Radojewski، نويسنده , , Mary J. Roman، نويسنده , , J. Philip Saul، نويسنده , , Mario P. Stylianou، نويسنده , , Lynn Mahony and for the Pediatric Heart Network Investigators، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
  • Pages
    8
  • From page
    624
  • To page
    631
  • Abstract
    Background Cardiovascular disease, including aortic root dilation, dissection, and rupture, is the leading cause of mortality in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). The maximal aortic root diameter at the sinuses of Valsalva is considered the best predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcome. Although advances in therapy have improved life expectancy, affected individuals continue to suffer cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Recent studies in an FBN1-targeted mouse model of MFS with aortic disease similar to that seen in humans showed that treatment with losartan normalized aortic root growth and aortic wall architecture. Methods The Pediatric Heart Network designed a randomized clinical trial to compare aortic root growth and other short-term cardiovascular outcomes in subjects with MFS receiving atenolol or losartan. Individuals 6 months to 25 years of age with a body surface area–adjusted aortic root z score >3.0 will be eligible for inclusion. The primary aim is to compare the effect of atenolol therapy with that of losartan therapy on the rate of aortic root growth over 3 years. Secondary end points include progression of aortic regurgitation; incidence of aortic dissection, aortic root surgery, and death; progression of mitral regurgitation; left ventricular size and function; echocardiographically derived measures of central aortic stiffness; skeletal and somatic growth; and incidence of adverse drug reactions. Conclusion This randomized trial should make a substantial contribution to the management of individuals with MFS and expand our understanding of the mechanisms responsible for the aortic manifestations of this disorder.
  • Journal title
    American Heart Journal
  • Serial Year
    2007
  • Journal title
    American Heart Journal
  • Record number

    535021