Title of article :
Retrospective application of the NEXUS low-risk criteria for cervical spine radiography in Canadian emergency departments
Author/Authors :
Garth Dickinson، نويسنده , , Ian G. Stiell، نويسنده , , Michael Schull، نويسنده , , Robert Brison، نويسنده , , Catherine M Clement، نويسنده , , Katherine L. Vandemheen، نويسنده , , Daniel Cass، نويسنده , , Douglas McKnight، نويسنده , , Gary Greenberg، نويسنده , , James S. Worthington، نويسنده , , Mark Reardon، نويسنده , , Laurie Morrison، نويسنده , , Mary A Eisenhauer، نويسنده , , Jonathan Dreyer، نويسنده , , George A Wells، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages :
8
From page :
507
To page :
514
Abstract :
Study objective We evaluate the accuracy, reliability, and potential impact of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) low-risk criteria for cervical spine radiography, when applied in Canadian emergency departments (EDs). Methods The Canadian C-Spine Rule derivation study was a prospective cohort study conducted in 10 Canadian EDs that recruited alert and stable adult trauma patients. Physicians completed a 20-item data form for each patient and performed interobserver assessments when feasible. The prospective assessments included the 5 individual NEXUS criteria but not an explicit interpretation of the overall need for radiography according to the criteria. Patients underwent plain radiography, flexion-extension views, and computed tomography at the discretion of the treating physician. Patients who did not have radiography were followed up with a structured outcome assessment by telephone to determine clinically important cervical spine injury, a previously validated outcome measurement. Analyses included sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence interval (CI), κ coefficient, and potential radiography rates. Results Among 8,924 patients, 151 (1.7%) patients had an important cervical spine injury. The combined NEXUS criteria identified important cervical spine injury with a sensitivity of 92.7% (95% CI 87% to 96%) and a specificity of 37.8% (95% CI 37% to 39%). Application of the NEXUS criteria would have potentially reduced cervical spine radiography rates by 6.1% from the actual rate of 68.9% to 62.8%. Of 11 patients with important injuries not identified, 2 were treated with internal fixation and 3 with a halo. Conclusion This retrospective validation found the NEXUS low-risk criteria to be less sensitive than previously reported. The NEXUS low-risk criteria should be further explicitly and prospectively evaluated for accuracy and reliability before widespread clinical use outside of the United States.
Journal title :
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Serial Year :
2004
Journal title :
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Record number :
537616
Link To Document :
بازگشت