Title of article :
Consequences of discharges from intensive care at night Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
C Goldfrad، نويسنده , , K Rowan، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2000
Pages :
5
From page :
1138
To page :
1142
Abstract :
Background It is generally believed that pressure for beds on intensive-care units (ICUs) has increased in the UK. This study used discharge at night as a proxy measure to investigate pressure. Methods Night was defined in two ways: “out of office hoursʹ from 2200 to 0659 h and “the early hours of the morning” from 0000 to 0459 h. The rate of discharge at night was compared for 21 295 adult admissions to 62 ICUs covering the period 1995–98 with 10 806 admissions to 26 ICUs covering the period 1988–90. With data solely from 1995–98, the consequences of discharge at night and premature discharge were investigated. Findings Overall, 2269 (21·0%) admissions did not survive the ICU in 1988–90 compared with 4487 (21·1%) in 1995–98. Of ICU survivors, 2·7% were discharged at night (2200–0659 h) in 1988–90 compared with 6·0% in 1995–98. In 1995–98, night discharges (2200–0659 h) had a higher crude (odds ratio 1·46, 95% Cl 1·18–1·80) and case-mix adjusted (1·33, 1·06–1·65) ultimate hospital mortality. Higher odds ratios were observed when the definition of night was 0000–0459 h. Premature discharge was commoner at night, 42·6% vs 5·0% and its importance was apparent when incorporated into the logistic-regression model (premature discharge 1·35, 1·10–1·65; night discharge 1·17, 0·92–1·49). Interpretation Night discharges from ICU are increasing in the UK. This practice is of concern because patients discharged at night fare significantly worse than those discharged during the day. Night discharges are more likely to be “premature” in the view of the clinicians involved. The implication of these results is that many hospitals have insufficient intensive-care beds. In deciding whether or not to invest more resources in intensive care we must, however, consider the cost-utility of this particular service compared with other ways that additional resources could be used.
Journal title :
The Lancet
Serial Year :
2000
Journal title :
The Lancet
Record number :
551451
Link To Document :
بازگشت