Title of article :
Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow up of a randomised controlled trial
Author/Authors :
Edward F Smyth، نويسنده , , Richard P Baker، نويسنده , , Bert J Wilken، نويسنده , , John E Hartley، نويسنده , , Tim J White، نويسنده , , John RT Monson، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
Pages :
2
From page :
1437
To page :
1438
Abstract :
Advantages of the stapling procedure for haemorrhoids include reduced postoperative pain and shortened convalescence; however, there are few data with respect to functional and symptomatic outcome. At a dedicated clinic, we reviewed patients between Dec, 2001, and March, 2002, who had taken part in a randomised controlled trial undertaken at the unit in 1999, which compared outcomes after open or stapled haemorrhoidectomy. We noted the presence or absence of haemorrhoid specific symptoms, and assessed overall satisfaction, continence, and quality of life. Rigid sigmoidoscopy and an anorectal examination were also used to examine symptomatic recurrence and disease activity. At minimum follow-up of 33 months since surgery, both techniques seem to be equally effective.
Journal title :
The Lancet
Serial Year :
2003
Journal title :
The Lancet
Record number :
558812
Link To Document :
بازگشت