Title of article
Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow up of a randomised controlled trial
Author/Authors
Edward F Smyth، نويسنده , , Richard P Baker، نويسنده , , Bert J Wilken، نويسنده , , John E Hartley، نويسنده , , Tim J White، نويسنده , , John RT Monson، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
Pages
2
From page
1437
To page
1438
Abstract
Advantages of the stapling procedure for haemorrhoids include reduced postoperative pain and shortened convalescence; however, there are few data with respect to functional and symptomatic outcome. At a dedicated clinic, we reviewed patients between Dec, 2001, and March, 2002, who had taken part in a randomised controlled trial undertaken at the unit in 1999, which compared outcomes after open or stapled haemorrhoidectomy. We noted the presence or absence of haemorrhoid specific symptoms, and assessed overall satisfaction, continence, and quality of life. Rigid sigmoidoscopy and an anorectal examination were also used to examine symptomatic recurrence and disease activity. At minimum follow-up of 33 months since surgery, both techniques seem to be equally effective.
Journal title
The Lancet
Serial Year
2003
Journal title
The Lancet
Record number
558812
Link To Document