Author/Authors :
Luc Escudié، نويسنده , , Claire Francoz، نويسنده , , Jean-Pierre Vinel، نويسنده , , Rami Moucari، نويسنده , , Maxime Cournot، نويسنده , , Valérie Paradis، نويسنده , , Alain Sauvanet، نويسنده , , Jacques Belghiti، نويسنده , , Dominique Valla، نويسنده , , Jacques Bernuau، نويسنده , , Jean-François Durand، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Background/Aims
Amanita phalloides poisoning is an uncommon cause of acute liver failure with an especially rapid course. The aim of this study was to re-assess transplantation criteria in patients with mushroom poisoning.
Methods
Twenty-seven patients admitted for Amanita phalloides poisoning were studied. Previously reported transplantation criteria, including the recent Ganzert’s criteria, were tested retrospectively.
Results
The rate of fatal intoxication (death and/or transplantation) was 8/27 (30%). An interval between ingestion and diarrhea <8 h was a very early predictor of a fatal outcome (accuracy of 78%). Later on, non-paracetamol and paracetamol King’s College criteria were superior to Clichy’s and Ganzert’s criteria (accuracy of 100% compared to 85% and 85%, respectively). Encephalopathy and renal insufficiency were not constant in the fatal intoxication group. Prothrombin index below 10% 4 days or more after ingestion had a 100% accuracy for predicting a fatal outcome.
Conclusions
Liver transplantation should be strongly considered in patients with an interval between ingestion and diarrhea <8 h. Encephalopathy should not be an absolute prerequisite for deciding transplantation. From day 4 after ingestion, prothrombin index lower than 10% (≈INR of 6) alone is a reliable tool for deciding emergency transplantation.
Keywords :
Mushroom poisoning , acute liver failure , liver transplantation , Amanita phalloides