Title of article :
Corrected coronary flow velocity reserve: a new concept for assessing coronary perfusion
Author/Authors :
Heinrich Wieneke، نويسنده , , Michael Haude، نويسنده , , Junbo Ge، نويسنده , , Christoph Altmann، نويسنده , , Sigrid Kaiser، نويسنده , , Dietrich Baumgart، نويسنده , , Clemens von Birgelen، نويسنده , , Dirk Welge، نويسنده , , Raimund Erbel، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2000
Abstract :
OBJECTIVES
In order to limit the variability of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), we analyzed which factors independently affect CFVR and established a new parameter integrating these factors.
BACKGROUND
Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) is a frequently used parameter for evaluating the physiological significance of epicardial stenosis and microvascular function. Since CFVR measurements are done in substantially different hemodynamic and clinical situations, interpretation of CFVR requires correction for major influencing factors.
METHODS
In 141 patients with angina-like symptoms and angiographically unobstructed coronary arteries, intracoronary Doppler measurements were performed in at least two coronary vessels. Coronary flow velocity reserve was calculated as the ratio of hyperemic average peak velocity (hAPV), after intracoronary bolus of adenosine, to baseline average peak velocity (bAPV).
RESULTS
Analysis of covariance revealed that only bAPV (p < 0.0001) and age (p < 0.0001) were independent factors influencing CFVR. Based on a regression model for estimation of predicted CFVR values, individual CFVR values (CFVRind) obtained at different bAPV and age were transformed in corrected CFVR values (CFVRcorr) by relating them to a mean bAPV of 15 cm/s and a mean age of 55 years. The transformation from CFVRind into CFVRcorr for the left anterior descending artery can be done by using the following equation: CFVRcorr = 2.85*CFVRind*10 0.48*log(bAPV) + 0.0025*age − 1.16. When applying this new parameter to conditions assumed to cause microvascular dysfunction, analysis showed that only patients with diabetes showed a significant decrease of traditional CFVR and CFVRcorr, whereas a history of hypertension and current smoking habit had no influence on CFVRcorr.
CONCLUSIONS
The concept of CFVRcorr standardizes CFVR for bAPV and age as the major physiological determinants. Especially in patients with microvascular dysfunction, this approach may help to discriminate between conditions directly affecting vasodilator reserve and conditions primarily affecting bAPV.
Keywords :
body mass index , left circumflex artery , coronary flow velocity reserve , Right coronary artery , CFVRcorr , CFVR , RCA , corrected coronary flow velocity reserve—CFVR value corrected for bAPV and age , individual coronary flow velocity reserve of a certain patient , CFVRind , CFVRpred , ECG , predicted coronary flow velocity reserve—CFVR value predicted by the covariance model for a certain bAPV and age , Electrocardiogram , log10 transformed for statistical analysis , hyperemic average peak velocity , bAPV , LAD , baseline average peak velocity , left anterior descending artery , A , hAPV , BMI , LCx
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)