Title of article
The myth of agency and patient choice in health care? The case of drug treatments to prevent coronary disease
Author/Authors
Stirling Bryan، نويسنده , , Paramjit Gill and Kaya Forest ، نويسنده , , Sheila Greenfield، نويسنده , , Kerry Gutridge، نويسنده , , Tom Marshall، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
دوهفته نامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages
4
From page
2698
To page
2701
Abstract
Patient choice is at the heart of health-care reform programmes in the UK and in many other countries. The success of patient choice initiatives is dependent on a well-functioning agency relationship in health care. We interviewed 197 patients from 13 general practices in the West Midlands, UK, both before and after coronary screening. Our study suggests that, for patients presenting for coronary risk screening in primary care, the agency relationship is not working well—patients’ expressed preferences relating to decisions to commence drug treatments were largely over-ridden in the clinical consultation. Therefore, if choice is to be a real driver of change in health care it needs to encompass patient empowerment and be based on a more collaborative approach to decision making between patients and professionals.
Keywords
UK , Agency relationship , coronary disease , Choice , Drug treatments
Journal title
Social Science and Medicine
Serial Year
2006
Journal title
Social Science and Medicine
Record number
603136
Link To Document