Title of article :
Revascularization in severe ventricular dysfunction (15% ≤ LVEF ≤ 30%): a comparison of bypass grafting and percutaneous intervention
Author/Authors :
Koichi Toda، نويسنده , , Karen Mackenzie، نويسنده , , Mandeep R. Mehra، نويسنده , , Charles J. DiCorte، نويسنده , , James E. Davis Jr.، نويسنده , , P. Michael McFadden، نويسنده , , John L. Ochsner، نويسنده , , Christopher White، نويسنده , , Clifford H. Van Meter Jr، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
Pages :
6
From page :
2082
To page :
2087
Abstract :
Background We sought to determine the optimal approach to revascularization of patients with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Methods We conducted a single-center observational study of 117 consecutive patients who had severe LV dysfunction (15% ≤ LV ejection fraction ≤ 30%) and underwent either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG, N = 69) or percutaneous revascularization (n = 48) between 1992 and 1997. Results The CABG group was younger (62 versus 67 years, p = 0.026), and fewer previous bypasses (7% versus 40%, p< 0.0001) and fewer prior percutaneous revascularizations (16% versus 42%, p = 0.0019) were noted. More vessels were revascularized (3 ± 0.8 versus 1.5 ± 0.7, p< 0.0001), and revascularization was more complete by CABG (84% versus 48%, p< 0.0001). Morbidity and mortality at 30 days were similar, and there was no significant difference in 3-year survival (73% versus 67%), although 3-year cardiac event-free survival (52% versus 25%, p = 0.0011) and 3-year target vessel revascularization–free survival (71% versus 41%, p< 0.0001) were significantly better in the CABG group, and LV ejection fraction was significantly improved after CABG. In the subgroup of patients 65 years of age or older and those without proximal left anterior descending coronary artery lesions, significant benefit of CABG in cardiac event-free and target vessel revascularization–free survival disappeared. Conclusions We found that in clinically selected patients with severe ventricular dysfunction, CABG compared with percutaneous revascularization achieves more complete revascularization, improved LV function, fewer cardiac events, and fewer target vessel revascularizations, but does not affect mid-term survival. A prospective controlled trial with defined criteria for treatment assignment is warranted to confirm our results regarding the two revascularization strategies in patients with severe LV dysfunction.
Journal title :
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Serial Year :
2002
Journal title :
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Record number :
606208
Link To Document :
بازگشت