Title of article :
Allograft Heart Valve Viability and Valve-Processing Variables
Author/Authors :
Kenneth L. Gall BApplSc، نويسنده , , Susan E. Smith BSc، نويسنده , , Christene A. Willmette EN، نويسنده , , Mark F. O’Brien FRACS، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1998
Pages :
7
From page :
1032
To page :
1038
Abstract :
Background. The impact of allograft valve viability on valve durability remains controversial. Analyses of our clinical results have demonstrated the superiority of the cryopreserved valve viable at the time of implantation over the 4°C stored valve nonviable at the time of implantation. In this study, we quantitatively assessed the effects on viability of current and past valve-processing protocols at The Prince Charles Hospital. Methods. The viability of pulmonary valves was quantitatively analyzed by thin-layer autoradiography to assess the effects of donor type, antibiotics, and valve storage. Results. Control valve segments obtained from beating-heart donor valves had a higher initial viability (0.92 ± 0.02) than nonbeating-heart donor valves (0.66 ± 0.03). Cryopreservation after low-dose antibiotic sterilization significantly reduced viability to 50% to 60% of the control, and in the presence of amphotericin B, viability dropped further to 10% to 36% of the control. After 7 days’ storage at 4°C, viability was reduced to 2% of control and to 0% viability after 21 days. Conclusions. For maximal preimplantation viability, valves should be procured as soon as possible after cessation of heart beat and should be cryopreserved if they are not to be clinically implanted within 1 to 2 days. Amphotericin B should not be used in conjunction with cryopreservation if viability is to be maximized.
Journal title :
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Serial Year :
1998
Journal title :
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Record number :
614978
Link To Document :
بازگشت