Title of article :
Is fear of anaphylactic shock discouraging surgeons from more widely adopting percutaneous and laparoscopic techniques in the treatment of liver hydatid cyst?
Author/Authors :
Rami Yaghan، نويسنده , , Hussein Heis، نويسنده , , Kamal Bani-Hani، نويسنده , , Ismail Matalka، نويسنده , , Nawaf Shatanawi، نويسنده , , Kamal Gharaibeh، نويسنده , , Amjad Bani-Hani، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages :
5
From page :
533
To page :
537
Abstract :
Background Sources of reports about laparoscopic and percutaneous treatment of liver hydatid cysts are limited to just a few countries. To address the reason behind this, we carried out a survey of 30 surgeons in northern Jordan. Methods A questionnaire was distributed to collect data regarding the surgical technique preferred by each surgeon. Further information was collected from those not adopting minimal-access techniques to determine their reasons for not doing so. Results Only 3 surgeons (10%) considered laparoscopy as the first line of treatment. Of the 27 surgeons who did not consider percutaneous or laparoscopic treatment, fear of anaphylaxis and/or dissemination was the main reason given by 21 surgeons (78%) for not using minimal access techniques. Conclusions The seemingly exaggerated traditional fear of anaphylaxis seems to discourage surgeons from more widely adopting minimal access techniques for the treatment of hydatid cyst.
Keywords :
Jordan , Hydatid cyst , surgery , Anaphylaxis , laparoscopy
Journal title :
The American Journal of Surgery
Serial Year :
2004
Journal title :
The American Journal of Surgery
Record number :
617532
Link To Document :
بازگشت