Title of article
Reinforcement of subcuticular continuous suture closure with surgical adhesive strips and gum mastic: Is there any additional strength provided?
Author/Authors
Reha Yavuzer، نويسنده , , Christopher Kelly، نويسنده , , Noreen Durrani، نويسنده , , Vijay Mittal، نويسنده , , Ian T. Jackson، نويسنده , , Stephen Remine، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages
4
From page
315
To page
318
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to compare the burst strength of suture closure versus the use of suture and strip together.
Methods
On cadavers, 50 skin incisions were closed as follows: group 1—subcuticular continuous suture; group 2—same suturing with placement of strips; group 3—same as group 2 except gum mastic was applied prior to strips; group 4—strips alone; and group 5—strips with gum mastic application. The separation forces were measured using a tensilometer.
Results
The mean separation forces were as follows: group 1, 14.17 kg; group 2, 14.37 kg; group 3, 15.39 kg; group 4, 1.52 kg; and group 5, 3.85 kg. There were no statistically significant differences between groups 1, 2, and 3. When compared with group 4, group 5 required markedly more force to separate the wound.
Conclusions
Strip reinforcement with/without gum mastic did not provide any additional strength when sutures were used. Gum mastic increased the adherence of strips and this was important when strips were the only means of wound closure.
Keywords
Skin closure , Surgical strip , Tensile strength , Gum mastic
Journal title
The American Journal of Surgery
Serial Year
2005
Journal title
The American Journal of Surgery
Record number
617865
Link To Document