• Title of article

    Reinforcement of subcuticular continuous suture closure with surgical adhesive strips and gum mastic: Is there any additional strength provided?

  • Author/Authors

    Reha Yavuzer، نويسنده , , Christopher Kelly، نويسنده , , Noreen Durrani، نويسنده , , Vijay Mittal، نويسنده , , Ian T. Jackson، نويسنده , , Stephen Remine، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
  • Pages
    4
  • From page
    315
  • To page
    318
  • Abstract
    Background This study aimed to compare the burst strength of suture closure versus the use of suture and strip together. Methods On cadavers, 50 skin incisions were closed as follows: group 1—subcuticular continuous suture; group 2—same suturing with placement of strips; group 3—same as group 2 except gum mastic was applied prior to strips; group 4—strips alone; and group 5—strips with gum mastic application. The separation forces were measured using a tensilometer. Results The mean separation forces were as follows: group 1, 14.17 kg; group 2, 14.37 kg; group 3, 15.39 kg; group 4, 1.52 kg; and group 5, 3.85 kg. There were no statistically significant differences between groups 1, 2, and 3. When compared with group 4, group 5 required markedly more force to separate the wound. Conclusions Strip reinforcement with/without gum mastic did not provide any additional strength when sutures were used. Gum mastic increased the adherence of strips and this was important when strips were the only means of wound closure.
  • Keywords
    Skin closure , Surgical strip , Tensile strength , Gum mastic
  • Journal title
    The American Journal of Surgery
  • Serial Year
    2005
  • Journal title
    The American Journal of Surgery
  • Record number

    617865