Author/Authors :
Hirotaka Tashiro، نويسنده , , Hideki Ohdan، نويسنده , , Toshiyuki Itamoto، نويسنده , , Minoru Ishifuro، نويسنده , , Hidetaka Hara، نويسنده , , Daisuke Tokita، نويسنده , , Takashi Onoe، نويسنده , , Kouhei Ishiyama، نويسنده , , Hiroshi Mitsuta، نويسنده , , Kentarou Ide، نويسنده , , Takayuki Ogawa، نويسنده , , Toshimasa Asahara، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Background
Portal vein reconstruction is still a crucial problem in living-donor liver transplantation. Vascular closure staples (VCS) have been applied for small peripheral and large vessels because of the technical ease with which they can be employed. We describe here our experience with portal vein reconstruction in living donor-liver transplantation and compare VCS with conventional sutures in portal vein reconstruction.
Methods
The anastomosis between the donor portal vein and recipient portal vein or the right external iliac vein graft was created using either VCS or conventional sutures.
Results
The stenotic ratios were .51 ± .15 and .79 ± .25 for the conventional sutures and VCS, respectively. The stenotic ratio was significantly lower in VCS compared with conventional sutures.
Conclusions
VCS compared with conventional sutures has the advantage of low risk of anastomotic stenosis.