Title of article :
A computerized method of viual acuity teting: Adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy tudy teting protocol
Author/Authors :
Roy W. Beck، نويسنده , , Pamela . Moke، نويسنده , , Andrew H. Turpin، نويسنده , , Frederick L. Ferri III، نويسنده , , John Paul anGiovanni، نويسنده , , Chri A. Johnon، نويسنده , , Eileen E. Birch، نويسنده , , Danielle L. Chandler، نويسنده , , Terry A. Cox، نويسنده , , R. Clifford Blair، نويسنده , , Raymond T. Kraker، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
Abstract :
Abtract
Purpoe
To develop a computerized method of viual acuity teting for clinical reearch a an alternative to the tandard Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy tudy (ETDR) teting protocol, and to evaluate it tet-retet reliability and concordance with tandard ETDR teting.
Deign
Tet-retet reliability tudy.
Method
Multicenter etting of a tudy population of 265 patient at three clinical ite. Viual acuity wa meaured with both the electronic viual acuity teting algorithm (E-ETDR) and tandard ETDR protocol (-ETDR) twice on one eye of each patient. E-ETDR teting wa conducted uing the electronic viual acuity teter (EVA), which utilize a programmed Palm (Palm, Inc, anta Clara, California, UA) hand-held device communicating with a peronal computer and 17-inch monitor at a tet ditance of 3 meter.
Reult
For the E-ETDR protocol, tet-retet reliability wa high (r = 0.99; with 89% and 98% of retet within 0.1 logMAR and 0.2 logMAR of initial tet, repectively) and comparable with that of -ETDR teting (r = 0.99; with 87% and 98% of retet within 0.1 logMAR and 0.2 logMAR of initial tet, repectively). The E-ETDR and -ETDR core were highly correlated (r = 0.96 for initial tet and R = 0.97 for repeat tet). Baed on etimate of 95% confidence interval, a change in viual acuity of 0.2 logMAR (10 letter) from a baeline level i unlikely to be related to meaurement variability uing either the E-ETDR or the -ETDR viual acuity teting protocol.
Concluion
The E-ETDR protocol ha high tet-retet reliability and good concordance with -ETDR teting. The computerized method ha advantage over the -ETDR teting in electronically capturing the data for each teted letter, requiring only a ingle ditance for teting from 20/12 to 20/800, potentially reducing teting time, and potentially decreaing technician-related bia.
Journal title :
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Journal title :
American Journal of Ophthalmology