Title of article
Methods for priority setting among clinical preventive services Original Research Article
Author/Authors
Michael V. Maciosek، نويسنده , , Ashley B. Coffield، نويسنده , , J. Michael McGinnis، نويسنده , , Jeffrey R. Harris، نويسنده , , M. Blake Caldwell، نويسنده , , Steven M. Teutsch، نويسنده , , David Atkins، نويسنده , , Jordan H. Richland، نويسنده , , Anne Haddix، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2001
Pages
10
From page
10
To page
19
Abstract
Overview: Methods used to compare the value of clinical preventive services based on two criteria—clinically preventable burden (CPB) and cost effectiveness (CE)—are described. A companion article provides rankings of clinical preventive services and discusses its uses for decision-makers; this article focuses on the methods, challenges faced, and solutions. The authors considered all types of data essential to measuring CPB and CE for services recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and developed methods essential to ensuring valid comparisons of different services’ relative value.
Keywords
data collection , delivery of healthcare , economics , access and evaluation , Health priorities , preventivehealth services , quality-adjusted life years (Am J Prev Med2001 , preventive medicine , 21(1):10 –19) © 2001 , Cost-benefit analysis , healthcare quality
Journal title
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Serial Year
2001
Journal title
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Record number
637429
Link To Document