Title of article :
Methods for priority setting among clinical preventive services Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
Michael V. Maciosek، نويسنده , , Ashley B. Coffield، نويسنده , , J. Michael McGinnis، نويسنده , , Jeffrey R. Harris، نويسنده , , M. Blake Caldwell، نويسنده , , Steven M. Teutsch، نويسنده , , David Atkins، نويسنده , , Jordan H. Richland، نويسنده , , Anne Haddix، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2001
Abstract :
Overview: Methods used to compare the value of clinical preventive services based on two criteria—clinically preventable burden (CPB) and cost effectiveness (CE)—are described. A companion article provides rankings of clinical preventive services and discusses its uses for decision-makers; this article focuses on the methods, challenges faced, and solutions. The authors considered all types of data essential to measuring CPB and CE for services recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and developed methods essential to ensuring valid comparisons of different services’ relative value.
Keywords :
data collection , delivery of healthcare , economics , access and evaluation , Health priorities , preventivehealth services , quality-adjusted life years (Am J Prev Med2001 , preventive medicine , 21(1):10 –19) © 2001 , Cost-benefit analysis , healthcare quality
Journal title :
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Journal title :
American Journal of Preventive Medicine