Title of article :
Creating a Model Program for Influenza Surveillance in California: Results from the 2005–2006 Influenza Season Original Research Article
Author/Authors :
Janice K. Louie، نويسنده , , David P. Schnurr، نويسنده , , Hugo F. Guevara، نويسنده , , Somayeh Honarmand، نويسنده , , Michele Cheung، نويسنده , , David Cottam، نويسنده , , Elaine Yeh، نويسنده , , Lauren Wold، نويسنده , , Erica J. Boston، نويسنده , , Janet Tang، نويسنده , , Kate C. Cummings، نويسنده , , Richard M. Donovan، نويسنده , , Robert Schechter، نويسنده , , Jon Rosenberg، نويسنده , , Lawrence J. Walter، نويسنده , , John A. Chapman، نويسنده , , Paul R. Brenner، نويسنده , , Roger P. Baxter، نويسنده , , Carol A. Glaser، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Pages :
5
From page :
353
To page :
357
Abstract :
Background Influenza surveillance is valuable for monitoring trends in influenza-related morbidity and mortality. Using the 2005–2006 influenza season as an example, this paper describes a comprehensive influenza surveillance program used by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). Methods Data collected from patients evaluated for acute respiratory illness in a given week were reported and summarized the following week, including (1) electronic hospital pneumonia and influenza admission and antiviral usage records from Kaiser Permanente, (2) sentinel provider influenza-like illness (ILI) reports, (3) severe pediatric influenza case reports (e.g., children either hospitalized in intensive care or expired), (4) school clinic ILI evaluations, and (5) positive influenza test results from a network of academic, hospital, commercial, and public health laboratories and the state CDPH Viral and Rickettsial Disease Laboratory. Results Influenza activity in California in the 2005–2006 season was moderate in severity; all clinical and laboratory markers rose and fell consistently. Extensive laboratory characterization identified the predominant circulating virus strain as A/California/7/2004(H3N2), which was a component of the 2005–2006 influenza vaccine; 96% of samples tested showed adamantane resistance. Conclusions By using multiple, complementary surveillance methods coupled with a strong laboratory component, the CDPH has developed a simple, flexible, stable, and widely accepted influenza surveillance system that can monitor trends in statewide influenza activity, ascertain the correlation between circulating strains with vaccine strains, and assist with detection of new strain variants. The methods described can serve as a model for influenza surveillance in other states.
Journal title :
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Serial Year :
2007
Journal title :
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Record number :
638287
Link To Document :
بازگشت