Title of article :
The safety of calcium channel blockers in human pregnancy: A prospective, multicenter cohort study, ,
Author/Authors :
Laura A. Magee، نويسنده , , Betsy Schick، نويسنده , , Alan E. Donnenfeld، نويسنده , , Suzanne R. Sage، نويسنده , , Beth Conover، نويسنده , , Lola Cook، نويسنده , , Patricia R. McElhatton، نويسنده , , Michael A. Schmidt، نويسنده , , Gideon Koren and Support in part by Miles Pharmaceuticals Inc.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1996
Pages :
6
From page :
823
To page :
828
Abstract :
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to examine the potential teratogenicity of calcium channel blockers. STUDY DESIGN: Six teratogen information services prospectively collected and followed up 78 women with first-trimester exposure to calcium channel blockers. Pregnancy outcome was compared (by paired t test or χ2 analysis) with that of a control group matched for maternal age and smoking. RESULTS: There was no increase in major malformations (2/66 = 3.0% [calcium channel blockers] vs 0% [nonteratogenic controls], p = 0.27); a fivefold increase was ruled out (baseline 2%, α = 0.05, β = 0.20). The defects reported were attributable to maternal diabetes or coingestion of teratogens. The increase in preterm delivery (28% [calcium channel blockers] vs 9% [nonteratogenic controls], p = 0.003), attributed to maternal disease by stepwise regression, was the most important factor responsible for the observed decrease in birth weight (mean -334 gm vs nonteratogenic controls, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that calcium channel blockers do not represent a major teratogenic risk. (AM J OBSTET GYNECOL 1996;174:823-8.)
Keywords :
Calcium Channel Blockers , pregnancy , pregnanQ complications , birth weight
Journal title :
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Serial Year :
1996
Journal title :
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Record number :
639397
Link To Document :
بازگشت