• Title of article

    Can uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery be predicted?

  • Author/Authors

    George A. Macones، نويسنده , , Alison G. Cahill، نويسنده , , David M. Stamilio، نويسنده , , Anthony Odibo، نويسنده , , Jeffrey Peipert، نويسنده , , Erika J. Stevens، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    1148
  • To page
    1152
  • Abstract
    Objective This study was undertaken to use multivariable methods to develop clinical predictive models for the occurrence of uterine rupture by using both antepartum and early intrapartum factors. Study design This was a planned secondary analysis from a multicenter case-control study of uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) delivery. Multivariable methods were used to develop 2 separate clinical predictive indices–one that used only prelabor factors and the other that used both prelabor and early labor factors. These indices were also assessed with the use of Receiver operating characteristic curves. Results We identified 134 cases of uterine rupture and 665 noncases. No single individual factor is sufficiently sensitive or specific for clinical prediction of uterine rupture. Likewise, the 2 clinical predictive indices were neither sufficiently sensitive nor specific for clinical use (receiver operating characteristic curve [area under the curve] 0.67 and 0.70, respectively). Conclusion Uterine rupture cannot be predicted with either individual or combinations of clinical factors. This has important clinical and medical-legal implications.
  • Keywords
    Uterine ruptureVBAC
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Serial Year
    2006
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Record number

    645719