Title of article
Can uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery be predicted?
Author/Authors
George A. Macones، نويسنده , , Alison G. Cahill، نويسنده , , David M. Stamilio، نويسنده , , Anthony Odibo، نويسنده , , Jeffrey Peipert، نويسنده , , Erika J. Stevens، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages
5
From page
1148
To page
1152
Abstract
Objective
This study was undertaken to use multivariable methods to develop clinical predictive models for the occurrence of uterine rupture by using both antepartum and early intrapartum factors.
Study design
This was a planned secondary analysis from a multicenter case-control study of uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) delivery. Multivariable methods were used to develop 2 separate clinical predictive indices–one that used only prelabor factors and the other that used both prelabor and early labor factors. These indices were also assessed with the use of Receiver operating characteristic curves.
Results
We identified 134 cases of uterine rupture and 665 noncases. No single individual factor is sufficiently sensitive or specific for clinical prediction of uterine rupture. Likewise, the 2 clinical predictive indices were neither sufficiently sensitive nor specific for clinical use (receiver operating characteristic curve [area under the curve] 0.67 and 0.70, respectively).
Conclusion
Uterine rupture cannot be predicted with either individual or combinations of clinical factors. This has important clinical and medical-legal implications.
Keywords
Uterine ruptureVBAC
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Serial Year
2006
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Record number
645719
Link To Document