Title of article
Induction of labor at term using isosorbide mononitrate simultaneously with dinoprostone compared to dinoprostone treatment alone: A randomized, controlled trial
Author/Authors
Monika M. W?lfler، نويسنده , , Fabio Facchinetti، نويسنده , , Paolo Venturini، نويسنده , , Ambros Huber، نويسنده , , Hanns Helmer، نويسنده , , Peter Husslein، نويسنده , , Walter Tschugguel، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages
6
From page
1617
To page
1622
Abstract
Objective
We aimed to determine whether isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) given simultaneously with dinoprostone in term pregnancies is superior to dinoprostone alone to promote delivery.
Study design
One hundred and twenty nulliparous women at term were randomly assigned to receive per vaginam IMN 40 mg or placebo in addition to 3 mg dinoprostone 2 times daily for up to 2 days. Analysis was by intention to treat.
Results
Baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. The induction to delivery intervals did not differ between the IMN and the placebo group (26.4 ± 14.4 vs 23.4 ± 14.8 hours, P = .408). IMN resulted in more headache compared to placebo (32/55 [58.2%] vs 2/55 [3.6%], P< .001).
Conclusion
Vaginally administered IMN does not play a role in promoting delivery in term pregnancy if given at the same time as dinoprostone. This might reflect its relaxant effect on the uterine fundus, which may overcome its cervical softening effect.
Keywords
Cervical ripeningLabor inductionIsosorbidemononitrateNitric oxideTerm pregnancy
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Serial Year
2006
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Record number
645814
Link To Document