• Title of article

    Induction of labor at term using isosorbide mononitrate simultaneously with dinoprostone compared to dinoprostone treatment alone: A randomized, controlled trial

  • Author/Authors

    Monika M. W?lfler، نويسنده , , Fabio Facchinetti، نويسنده , , Paolo Venturini، نويسنده , , Ambros Huber، نويسنده , , Hanns Helmer، نويسنده , , Peter Husslein، نويسنده , , Walter Tschugguel، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
  • Pages
    6
  • From page
    1617
  • To page
    1622
  • Abstract
    Objective We aimed to determine whether isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) given simultaneously with dinoprostone in term pregnancies is superior to dinoprostone alone to promote delivery. Study design One hundred and twenty nulliparous women at term were randomly assigned to receive per vaginam IMN 40 mg or placebo in addition to 3 mg dinoprostone 2 times daily for up to 2 days. Analysis was by intention to treat. Results Baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. The induction to delivery intervals did not differ between the IMN and the placebo group (26.4 ± 14.4 vs 23.4 ± 14.8 hours, P = .408). IMN resulted in more headache compared to placebo (32/55 [58.2%] vs 2/55 [3.6%], P< .001). Conclusion Vaginally administered IMN does not play a role in promoting delivery in term pregnancy if given at the same time as dinoprostone. This might reflect its relaxant effect on the uterine fundus, which may overcome its cervical softening effect.
  • Keywords
    Cervical ripeningLabor inductionIsosorbidemononitrateNitric oxideTerm pregnancy
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Serial Year
    2006
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Record number

    645814