Title of article
Comparison of Spirapril, Isradipine, or Combination in Hypertensive Patients With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy : Effects on LVH Regression and Arrhythmogenic Propensity
Author/Authors
Athanasios J. Manolis، نويسنده , , Demetrios Beldekos، نويسنده , , Stelios Handanis، نويسنده , , Gavrilos Haralabidis، نويسنده , , John Hatzissavas، نويسنده , , Stephanos Foussas، نويسنده , , Dennis V. Cokkinos، نويسنده , , Margaret Bresnahan، نويسنده , , Irene Gavras، نويسنده , , Haralambos Gavras، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1998
Pages
9
From page
640
To page
648
Abstract
Abstract
This study was designed to evaluate in 45 hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) the effects of a 6-month course with one of three different antihypertensive regimens (the calcium channel blocker isradipine, the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor spirapril in monotherapy, or a combination of the two drugs, n = 15 per group) on blood pressure, LVH regression, and various functional correlates of LVH. All three treatment modalities decreased significantly LV mass index by an average of 10%, although the combination had the greatest blood pressure-lowering effect and spirapril had the least, as assessed by office resting pressures, ambulatory monitoring, and isometric grip testing. There was no correlation between magnitude of blood pressure lowering and degree of LVH regression. The effects of treatment on pressor hormone profiles differed among groups, as spirapril tended to suppress angiotensin II and norepinephrine, whereas isradipine had opposite effects. Exercise tolerance was prolonged by all three regimens, but significantly more by the combination. All three regimens decreased significantly the double product by 10% to 15%. Indices of electrophysiologic stability calculated from analysis of ambulatory electrocardiogram exhibited significant improvement in several parameters such as QRS duration, presence of late potentials, and measures of heart rate variability, resulting in fewer episodes of simple or complex ventricular arrhythmia. We conclude that all three regimens produce significant LVH regression associated with improved functional capacity and electrical stability. These results reflect the sum of the differential hemodynamic and hormonal effects exerted by each treatment modality.
Article Outline
• Methods
• Patients
• Office blood pressure measurement
• Isometric exercise
• Exercise tolerance test
• Blood sampling
• Echocardiographic study
• Ambulatory blood pressure measurement
• Electrocardiography
• Ambulatory ECG monitoring
• Heart rate variability
• Nonspectral analysis
• Late potentials
• Statistical analysis
• Results
• Office blood pressure
• Isometric exercise
• Exercise tolerance test (ETT)
• Hormone profile
• Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
• Echocardiographic parameters
• Electrocardiographic measurements
• Late potentials
• Arrhythmias
• Heart rate variability
• Efficacy and tolerability
• Discussion
• References
Keywords
echocardiography , exercise tolerance , ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring. , Regression of left ventricularhypertrophy
Journal title
American Journal of Hypertension
Serial Year
1998
Journal title
American Journal of Hypertension
Record number
646906
Link To Document