Title of article
Survival and predictive clinical observations for morbidity in hypertensive patients treated for two decades. A prospective comparison with normotensive controls in the Primary Preventive Study in Gothenburg.
Author/Authors
Ove K. Andersson، نويسنده , , Bengt Persson، نويسنده , , Ola Samuelsson، نويسنده , , Lars Wilhelmsen، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1996
Pages
1
From page
1
To page
1
Abstract
Objective: To analyse the effect of long-term management of hypertension on mortality and morbidity compared to non-hypertensives from the same population, and to identify clinical observations predictive of progosis in hypertensive patients treated in a specialist out-patient clinic. Design and methods: In a prospective observational study of 7495 men, aged 47-54 years, 686 (9.2%) with a mean diastolic BP of 106 mmHg at entry were treated and followed for 20-24 years. They were treated with beta-adrenergic blocking drugs and/or thiazide diuretics and vasodilators. Mortality and morbidity, routine examinations and laboratory analyses were registered at annual check-up visits. Cause specific mortality of all men was received from the Official Statistics of Sweden. Results: There was a significant increased all cause mortality in treated hypertensives compared with non-hypertensives: (42.8%) and (30.7%); odds ratio: 1.7 (95% Cl: 1.44-1.98). The increased mortality was entirely due to cardiovascular disease (CVD)(24.7%vs13.3%) dominated by coronary heart disease (CHD)(20.0%vs10.6%) while the fatal stroke incidence was lower (4.1%vs1.9%) and non-cardiovascular mortality was 18.1%vs17.4% in treated hypertensives and controls, respectively Non-smokers had the best prognosis regarding CVD; odds ratio: 0.45 (95%Cl: 0.30-0.68) and regarding CH; odds ratio: 0.50(95%Cl:0.32-0.77) while achieved systolic BP was also related to prognosis: CVD, odds ratio: 1.02(95% Cl: 1.01-1.03); CHD, odds ratio: 1.02(95%Cl: 1.01-1.32) but initial BP and cholesterol were not related to outcome among the hypertensives in a logistic regression model. Using this model for all CV morbidity, among in-study variables only achieved BP but not reversal of i.e. LVH improved the prognosis. Conclusion: Middle-aged treated hypertensive patients have a significantly impaired survival expectancy ina 20 year perspective. Smoking and target organ involvement are significantly predictive of future CVD while prognosis is somewhat improved by BP control.
Journal title
American Journal of Hypertension
Serial Year
1996
Journal title
American Journal of Hypertension
Record number
649819
Link To Document