Abstract :
The delineation of constituency boundaries and variations in vote distribution
across districts often favor certain parties at the expense of others. Applying a
hitherto under-utilized formula (Brookes, 1959; Johnston et al., 1999), this study
investigates whether the mechanism translating votes into seats in Japan’s singlemember
districts results in systematic partisan advantage that may influence election
outcomes. Simulations are conducted for the 2003 and 2005 general elections under
two scenarios: where the governing coalition and the main opposition party receive
equal vote shares, and where their vote shares are reversed from the actual results.
Components of electoral bias are then disaggregated into size and distribution effects,
and the impact of malapportionment, electorate size, turnout, and the role of third
party/independent candidates on overall electoral bias is examined. Results show that
while partisan bias exists, disadvantages toward one party in some components are
likely to cancel out benefits derived fromothers, producing a relatively small net effect.
Furthermore, electoral bias in Japan is found to award sectoral rather than partisan
seat bonuses.