Abstract :
The international rule of law movement focuses too often on countries that many
of its professionals know less well than their own. As a result, rule of law assistance
has suffered from lack of legitimacy, shortage of competence, and insufficient
attention to its transnational relevance. But in a globalized age, the rule of
law enterprise increasingly blurs traditional boundaries – between north and south,
national and international, and capacity-building and implementing. Rule of law
problems are too vast, complex and inter-related not to draw upon the experience
and expertise of actors from all corners of the globe. But for that to happen, we
must begin to think about rule of law reform as something that happens, not only
‘there’ but ‘here’ as well.