Abstract :
In 1989, starting in Poland and spreading quickly throughout Central and Eastern
Europe, European communism imploded. In some places new states were born,
in others old ones re-established their independence. In all there was talk of ‘transition’
to something very different, something at the same time very new and very
old.
Twenty years on, a lot has changed. Much that seemed revolutionary then
seems old hat now. And the attempt to cut and paste forms, structures, and successes
from ‘normal’ societies, as the West was known in the East, has turned out
to be a far from conservative enterprise, not simple, and not always popular. Indeed,
homegrown conservatives have come to be suspicious of it, often accusing
their opponents – those devoted to democracy, capitalism and the rule of law, for
example – of untraditional and unforgivable radicalism. The suspicion is general,
encompassing many ideals and practices believed to be alien imports. It is most
vocally directed against democracy and capitalism. However it has also reached –
less perhaps as rejection in principle than disappointment in practice – that animating
ideal which has had such a renaissance since the collapse of communism
and in connection with it: the rule of law.
