Abstract :
As a result, there is vacillation between a complete lack of
interest while the conflict rages on un-noticed, and flashes of attention
when glimmers of phenomena are seen through the prism of Rwanda
(or other equally immediately emotive narratives) so that the outside
world can understand and process what seems otherwise completely
incomprehensible. At a practical policy level, abusive simplification
results in misguided action – humanitarianism or increased military
protection is seen as a temporary solution that too often becomes
a long-term strategy and substitution for meaningful political action.
The response, for example, to the October and November 2008 North
Kivu crisis was to augment the UN’s military presence so that they
can better ‘do protection’ in an operational environment in which all
sides have been implicated in atrocities to varying degrees. As such,
the underlying grievances, the manifestations of political and social
exclusion, which are at the root of the conflict, go and continue to go
largely unaddressed.
Today, the conflict in the DRC has, once again, disappeared from
the pages of newspapers. The interest of the world, captured briefly,
has moved on to other things. But in the Congo the conflict continues.
Keywords :
Africa , REVIEW ARTICLE , Congo , GREED , Emily Paddon , CREED