Abstract :
This article uses a case-study of agriculture to explore the range of anxieties and contradictions
surrounding women’s work in the interwar period. National statistics are shown to be inconsistent
and questionable, raising questions for historians reliant on official data, but they point to regional variation
as the continuous defining feature of female labour force participation. Looking beyond the quantitative data
a distinction emerges between traditional work on the land and processes. The article shows that women
workers in agriculture provoked vigorous debate among a range of interest groups about the scale, nature, and
suitability of this work. These groups, such as the National Federation of Women’s Institutes, the Women’s
Farm and Garden Association, and the National Union of Agricultural Workers represented a range of
social classes and outlooks, and had diverse agendas underpinning their interest. Consequently women’s
agricultural labour is exposed as a site of class and gender conflict, connecting to wider economic and cultural
tensions surrounding the place of women in interwar society.
