Title of article :
The United Kingdom government’s ‘business case’ approach to the regulation of retirement
Author/Authors :
FLYNN، MATTHEW نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
Abstract :
In the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006, the United Kingdom government
set a ‘default ’ retirement age of 65 years after which an employer can compulsorily
retire workers, and made it obligatory for employers to consider the ‘ business case ’
for any employees’ requests to continue in work after the default age. This is a
‘ light touch’ approach to reducing age discrimination at the workplace and to
changing the established ‘ culture of retirement’. While encouraging productive
staff to remain in post beyond 65 years of age, it leaves implementation of the
policies and achievement of their goals to the discretion of employers. This article
explores how British employers are adapting to the law, by drawing from interviews
with 70 managers from a wide range of organisations. Overall the collected
evidence shows the limits of a business case approach as a means of changing
employers’ practices. It was found that line managers, rather than senior managers
or human resources specialists, generally decide which employees can stay
employed after age 65 years. Consequently, the research suggests that opportunities
for workers aged 65 or more years to stay employed
are more the result of individual arrangements with their immediate managers
than changes in an organisation’s policies and practices. Altogether, the evidence
suggests that consolidation rather than eradication of the established retirement
culture has occurred
Keywords :
business case , public policy , Equality , Employer , Practices , work , Retirement , MATTHEW FLYNN
Journal title :
Ageing and Society
Journal title :
Ageing and Society