Title of article :
On the assessment of cognitive style: a commentary on Peterson, Deary, and Austin
Author/Authors :
Riding، Richard J. نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
Pages :
-892
From page :
893
To page :
0
Abstract :
The reliability of Ridingʹs popular Cognitive Styles Analysis test (CSA) was examined by comparing performance on the original CSA test and a new parallel version. Fifty participants completed both test versions twice, with the second sitting approximately a week later. Reliability was measured using parallel forms, test–re-test, and split-half analysis. Correlations of the verbal–imagery (VI) and wholist–analytic (WA) ratios from both test versions (original and parallel) were low (Range r=0.07 to r=0.36, Mean r=0.24). When the CSA and parallel form data were combined however, split-half analysis of the WA style ratio was stable (Mean r=0. 69) but the VI style ratio remained unreliable (Mean r=0.36).
Keywords :
Binomial distribution , random sum , sharpness results , discrete Taylor formula , stop-loss order , Poisson approximation , total variation distance , Stochastic order , finite signed measure
Journal title :
Personality and Individual Differences
Serial Year :
2003
Journal title :
Personality and Individual Differences
Record number :
65920
Link To Document :
بازگشت