Author/Authors :
Leonard A. Jason، نويسنده , , Meredyth Evans، نويسنده , , Abigail Brown، نويسنده , , Molly Brown، نويسنده , , Nicole Porter، نويسنده , , Jessica Hunnell، نويسنده , , Valerie Anderson، نويسنده , , Athena Lerch، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
In an effort to bring more standardization to the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) Fukuda et al. case definition [1], the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has developed an empirical case definition [2] that specifies criteria and instruments to diagnose CFS. The present study investigated the sensitivity and specificity of this CFS empirical case definition with diagnosed individuals with CFS from a community based study that were compared to non-CFS cases. All participants completed questionnaires measuring disability (Medical Outcome Survey Short-Form-36) [3], fatigue (the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory) [4], and symptoms (CDC Symptom Inventory) [5]. Findings of the present study indicated sensitivity and specificity problems with the CDC empirical CFS case definition.
Keywords :
Chronic fatigue syndrome , Empirical Case Definition , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Fukuda Criteria