Title of article :
Offensive Political Theory
Author/Authors :
Andrew Rehfeld، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
Pages :
22
From page :
465
To page :
486
Abstract :
Penn State’s decision to eliminate political theory set off existential angst about the status of political theory in the discipline. The organized, defensive responses to that decision failed to answer the central question it posed: Is “political theory” social science, and if not, why does it belong? I argue that social scientific political theory is political science and its many strains—conceptual, normative, and explanatory—belong in the discipline on their own terms. Humanistic research, like dermatology or music theory, is not political science and as such it should find another home. By explaining why (and what kinds of ) political theory is political science this article may wind up being offensive in both senses of the word. But it is meant to be in service to a more secure, stable, and productive interdisciplinary future for all kinds of political theory going forward.
Journal title :
Perspectives on Politics
Serial Year :
2010
Journal title :
Perspectives on Politics
Record number :
665273
Link To Document :
بازگشت