• Title of article

    Religious fictionalism defended: reply to Cordry

  • Author/Authors

    ANDREW ESHLEMAN، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
  • Pages
    6
  • From page
    91
  • To page
    96
  • Abstract
    In his paper, ‘A critique of religious fictionalism’, Benjamin Cordryraises a series of objections to a fictionalist form of religious non-realism thatI proposed in my earlier paper, ‘Can an atheist believe in God?’. They fall into twomain categories: those alleging that an atheist would be unjustified in adoptingfictionalism, and those alleging that fictionalism could not be successfullyimplemented, or practised communally. I argue that these objections can be met
  • Journal title
    Religious Studies
  • Serial Year
    2010
  • Journal title
    Religious Studies
  • Record number

    666153