Title of article :
Use of an integrative soil health test forevaluation of soil management impacts
Author/Authors :
O.J. Idowu، نويسنده , , H.M. van Es، نويسنده , , G.S. Abawi، نويسنده , , D.W. Wolfe، نويسنده , , R.R. Schindelbeck، نويسنده , , B.N. Moebius-Clune، نويسنده , , B.K. Gugino، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Pages :
11
From page :
214
To page :
224
Abstract :
Understanding the response of soil quality indicators to changes in management practices is essential for sustainable landmanagement. Soil quality indicators were measured for 2 years under established experiments with varying managementhistories and durations at four locations in New York State. The Willsboro (clay loam) and Aurora (silt loam) experimentswere established in 1992, comparing no-till (NT) to plow-till (PT) management under corn (Zea mays L.)–soybean (Glycinemax L.) rotation. The Chazy (silt loam) trial was established in 1973 as a factorial experiment comparing NT versus PT andthe crop harvesting method (corn silage versus corn grain). The Geneva (silt loam) experiment was established in 2003 withvegetable rotations with and without intervening soil building crops, each under three tillage methods (NT, PT and zone-till(ZT)) and three cover cropping systems (none, rye and vetch). Physical indicators measured were wet aggregate stability(WAS), available water capacity (AWC) and surface hardness (SH) and subsurface hardness (SSH). Soil biologicalindicators included organic matter (OM), active carbon (AC), potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN) and root diseasepotential (RDP). Chemical indicators included pH, P, K, Mg, Fe, Mn and Zn. Results from the Willsboro and Aurora sitesshowed significant tillage effects for several indicators including WAS, AWC, OM, AC, pH, P, K, Mg, Fe and Mn.Generally, the NT treatment had better indicator values than the PT treatments. At the Chazy site, WAS, AWC, OM, AC,pH, K and Mg showed significant differences for tillage and/or harvest method, also with NT showing better indicatorvalues compared to PT and corn grain better than corn silage. Aggregate stability was on average 2.5 times higher in NTcompared to PT treatments at Willsboro, Aurora and Chazy sites. OM was also 1.2, 1.1 and 1.5 times higher in NTcompared to PT treatments at Willsboro, Aurora and Chazy sites, respectively. At the Geneva site WAS, SH, AC, PMN, pH,P, K and Zn showed significant tillage effects. The cover crop effect was only significant for SH and PMN measurements.Indicators that gave consistent performance across locations included WAS, OM and AC, while PMN and RDP were siteand management dependent. The composite soil health index (CSHI) significantly differentiated between contrastingmanagement practices. The CSHI for the Willsboro site was 71% for NT and 59% for PT, while at the Aurora site it was61% for NT and 48% for PT after 15 years of tillage treatments.
Keywords :
Soil quality , Soil health , soil quality indicators , Cornell Soil Health Test , tillage
Journal title :
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
Serial Year :
2009
Journal title :
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems
Record number :
666210
Link To Document :
بازگشت