Title of article :
Evaluating Different Vaccine Routes Against Coccidiosis
Author/Authors :
Marina Bolzani Saad، نويسنده , , Tania Dello Monaco Martins Bona، نويسنده , , Clovis Augusto Versalli Serafini، نويسنده , , Francine Romani، نويسنده , , Joelma Moura Alvarez، نويسنده , , Mariana Camargo Lourengo and Elizabeth Santin، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Abstract :
The effect of coccidiosis vaccine route on animal development and the efficiency of different routes to protect birds against different Eimeria challenges were evaluated. 135 Isa Brown® birds were used in two experimental phases. In the first phase, the birds were distributed in three treatments: non-vaccinated, vaccinated against coccidiosis by water and vaccinated by spray. In the second phase, these birds were challenged separately with different eimeria species oocysts (E. maximum, E. acervulina, E. tenella and £ necatrix). Weight gain, relative weight of Fabricius bursa, degrees of lesions in the intestines and counting of oocysts in the coproparasitological examination were evaluated. As a result, in most cases, birds challenged with different eimeria species and vaccinated against coccidiosis, by water or spray, showed better physical conditions, mainly by: best weight gain and lower intestinal lesions scores, compared to the birds challenged and non-vaccinated. Another interesting result refers to the different vaccine routes, showing no significant difference regarding the effectiveness of the vaccine and the vaccine reaction in animals.
Keywords :
administration routes , Poultry , vaccination , Coccidiosis
Journal title :
International Journal of Poultry Science
Journal title :
International Journal of Poultry Science