Title of article :
TREATMENT OF INFANTILE SPASMS; TETRACOSECTIDE OR VIGABATRIN? A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Author/Authors :
Amirsalari ، S. نويسنده Pediatric Neurologist,Assistant Professor, Baqyiatallah University of Medical Sciences , Department Of Pediatrics,Baqiatallah Hospital , , Kavehmanesh، Z. نويسنده Pediatrician, Assistant Professor, Baqyiatallah University of Medical Sciences , Department Of Pediatrics,Baqiatallah Hospita , , Khalili Matinzadeh، Z. نويسنده Pediatrician, Assistant Professor, Baqyiatallah University of Medical Sciences , Department Of Pediatrics,Baqiatallah Hospita ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی - سال 2006
Abstract :
Introduction:
Infantile spasms (IS) is an age specific epileptic syndrome. Due to poor
response of IS to conventional antiepileptic drugs, scientists are always on
the lookout for newer, more effective drugs to treat the condition.
Materials & Methods:
In this study, 50 infants with IS symptoms, aged between 2-24 months, were
randomly divided into two equal groups, each treated either with Vigabatrin
or ACTH (long acting Tetracosectide); the results for clinical efficacy of
medication and drug side effects were compared.
Results:
After the sixth week of treatment, in the Vigabatrin group, 28% complete
remission and 40% reduction in seizure frequencies was seen, while in the
Tetracosectide group there were 40.9% complete remission and 45.5%
reduction in seizure frequencies, showing no significant difference between
the clinical responses found in the two groups (P=0.44).
Conclusion:
Vigabatrin effeciacy is similar to Tetracosectide, but since it is impossible to
evaluate visual field constriction, a probable irreversible side effect of Vigabatrin
, Itʹs better to use Tetracosectide for the first line in the treatment of IS .
Journal title :
Iranian Journal of Child Neurology (IJCN)
Journal title :
Iranian Journal of Child Neurology (IJCN)