• Title of article

    Predicting Recurrence and Progression in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Using European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Risk Tables

  • Author/Authors

    Ather، M Hammad نويسنده Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi , , Zaidi ، Masooma نويسنده Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi ,

  • Issue Information
    فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 23 سال 2009
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    189
  • To page
    193
  • Abstract
    Introduction: We determined the recurrence and progression at 1 year in patients with non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and compared those with the calculated risk according to the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Materials and Methods: Follow-up data of 92 patients with non-muscleinvasive bladder cancer who underwent TURBT were reviewed, and their 1st year recurrence and progression were recorded. The risk of recurrence and progression were calculated for 1 year according to the EORTC scoring system, using tumors’ stage, grade, size, and multiplicity, and the presence of carcinoma in situ and previous recurrence episodes. The outcomes were compared with the EORTC’s predictive scores. Results: The patients were 75 men and 17 women with an age range of 31 to 91 years. Sixteen patients (17.4%) had a recurrent disease, 41 (44.6%) had a tumor larger than 3 cm in diameter, 35 (38.0%) had multiple lesions, 2 (2.2%) had carcinoma in situ, 73 (79.3%) had stage T1 lesions, and 8 (8.7%) had a high-grade disease. Recurrence was found in 34 patients (37.0%). The recurrence rates were 20.0%, 28.2%, 40.5%, and 83.3% in groups with the predicted EORTC risks of 15%, 24%, 38%, and 61%, respectively. There were 2 patients (2.2%) with progression of the diseases. Conclusion: A significant concordance was noted between the EORTC’s predicted risk and the actuarial recurrence rate of stage Ta T1 bladder cancer at 1 year. Progression was less than that predicted, probably due to our small sample size.
  • Journal title
    Urology Journal
  • Serial Year
    2009
  • Journal title
    Urology Journal
  • Record number

    681261