Title of article :
What are Differences between Non-injecting and Injecting Drug Addicts?
Author/Authors :
Noroozi، Mehdi نويسنده Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , , Nedjat، Saharnaz نويسنده , , Golestan، Banafsheh نويسنده , , Majdzadeh، Reza نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی 0 سال 2012
Abstract :
Background: This study aims to identify the differences between
Injecting Drug Users (IDUs) and non?IDUs, with regard to
some potential factors. This could be useful to design effective
interventions for harm reduction, which is one of the priority
areas in reducing the burden of addiction.
Methods: Sixty cases and 60 controls participated in this
pair?matched case?control study, which was conducted in Tehran.
The cases were IDUs who were asked to introduce two friends; one
IDU and the other non?IDU as the paired control. In addition to
demographic variables, onset age of cigarette smoking, dropping
out of school, imprisonment, history of being sexually abused for
money, and family history of using illegal drugs were obtained
from the cases and controls via an interview. Pair Odds Ratio (OR)
was estimated through McNemar and conditional multivariable
logistic regression analysis.
Results: Eighty?three % of the IDUs and 92% the controls were
male. The mean for onset age of cigarette smoking was 16 in the
cases and 20 in the controls, which was significantly different
between cases and controls (P < 0.001).
In the multivariate analysis, dropping out from school was
significantly different between cases and controls (OR=4.22
95% CI: 2.23 – 14.0). Imprisonment was more frequent in IDUs
compared to non?IDUs (OR=3.70 95% CI: 1.09 – 11.08). The
cases had more sexual relationship for earning money compared
to the controls (OR=3.14 95% CI: 1.24 – 13.70). Onset age of
cigarette smoking was significantly (P < 0.001) sooner in the IDUs
compared to the non?IDUs (15.9 and 20.1 years, respectively).
IDUs reported 5.5 times more that non?IDUs of having an addict
in their family (P value=0.04).
Conclusion: The finding of this study can be useful in identifying
the persons who are at risk of IDU. Therefore, people who involve
with risk factors recognized in this study should be triggered for
harm reduction prevention strategies.
Journal title :
International Journal of Preventive Medicine (IJPM)
Journal title :
International Journal of Preventive Medicine (IJPM)