Author/Authors :
Ocal، Pelin نويسنده Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpa?a Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey , , Cift، Tayfur نويسنده Ministry of Health of Turkey, Malkara State Hospital, Tekirda?, Turkey , , Bulut، Berk نويسنده Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpa?a Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey , , Balcan، Eray نويسنده Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpa?a Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey , , Cepni، Ismail نويسنده Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpa?a Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey , , Aydogan، Begum نويسنده Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpa?a Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey , , ?rez، Tulay نويسنده Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpa?a Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey ,
Abstract :
Background: This study evaluated the characteristics and results of patients who suffer
from recurrent implantation failure (RIF).
Materials and Methods: In this cross sectional study, a total of 2183 cases who were
evaluated retrospectively at the Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department
of Obstetrics and Gyneacology, IVF unit between 2000-2007. According to the data
gathered, we included 1822 cases in this study. We compared 185 patients with RIF to 1637
women without RIF.
Results: Pregnancy was achieved by 589 couples out of 1822 (32%). The implantation rate
was 10%, which declined to 5.8% after the fourth attempt. In the RIF group, patients’ mean
age was higher and there were more overweight women, the duration of fertility was longer,
day 3 follicle stimulation hormone (FSH) levels and the total gonadotropin dose administered
were higher, mean level of Estradiol (E2) on the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)
day was lower, and the mean level of progesterone on the hCG day was elevated compared
to the non-RIF group. Although the comparison of MII oocyte number was not significant,
the mean number of fertilized oocytes was found to be significant in favor of the non-RIF
group. The endometrial thicknesses were found to be similar for both groups. Comparison
of sperm motility and morphology were statistically significant in favor of the RIF group.
Conclusion: In our study, we have found that the group with RIF were comprised of
patients with poor prognosis who were older, overweight, had a longer infertility duration,
a higher FSH level, and needed more gonadotropin doses in controlled ovarian
hyperstimulation (COH). Sperm motility and morphology were better in the RIF group
compared to the non-RIF group, and multiple pregnancy rates were lower in RIF patients.