Abstract :
Background: Over the years, various types of orthoses have been
designed to assist subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI) to stand and
walk. However, the functional performance of the orthoses has not
been adequate, that is, patients experience stability problems, consume
excessive energy during ambulation, and generally require assistance in
donning and doffing the devices. This research is aimed at categorizing
the available orthoses designed specifically for SCI patients and to
compare the available orthoses according to the energy consumption,
stability analysis, and gait parameters.
Methods: An electronic search was done in PubMed, Embase,
and ISI Web of Knowledge databases to extract data related to 1960 –
2010. The available orthoses were characterized based on the level of
stabilization they provided and the source of power used. The orthoses
were compared based on the stability, energy consumption, and gait
performance parameters, according to the results of various studies
collected from the literature review.
Results: Among various orthoses designed for paraplegic
subjects, the mechanical orthoses seemed to have a better performance.
Moreover, donning and doffing of the mechanical orthosis was easier
for the subjects.
Conclusion: Although the HGO has better functional performance
than other available orthoses, the subjects are more willing to use
the RGO. The new design of orthoses must allow easy donning
and doffing by the users, have enough stability during walking and
standing, and enable the patients to change the alignment of the
orthosis to suit their needs.