Title of article :
Discrete choice survey experiments: A comparison using flexible methods
Author/Authors :
Juha Siikam?ki، نويسنده , , David F. Layton، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Pages :
18
From page :
122
To page :
139
Abstract :
This study investigates the convergent validity of discrete choice contingent valuation (CV) and contingent rating/ranking (CR) methods using flexible econometric methods. Our results suggest that CV and CR can produce consistent data (achieve convergent validity) when respondentʹs preferred choices and the same changes in environmental quality are considered. We also find that CR models that go beyond modeling the preferred choice and include additional ranks cannot be pooled with the CV models. Accounting for preference heterogeneity via random coefficient models and their flexible structure does not make rejection of the hypothesis of convergent validity less likely, but instead rejects the hypothesis to about the same degree or perhaps more frequently than fixed parameter models commonly used in the literature.
Keywords :
nonmarket valuation , Random coefficients , Rayleigh , Stated preferences , Discrete choice methods , Data pooling , Habitatconservation
Journal title :
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Serial Year :
2007
Journal title :
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
Record number :
704065
Link To Document :
بازگشت