Author/Authors :
Hielke Buddelmeyer، نويسنده , , John Freebairn and Guyonne Kalb، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
This article compares five alternative policy
options with the January 2006 tax and social
security system. Each option is designed to cost
a similar amount of approximately $5 billion
per year to the government at the observed
level of labour supply. The five options include
reducing the lowest income tax rate, increasing
the tax-free threshold, increasing the low income
tax offset, decreasing all taper rates on
own and partner’s incomes for a number of allowances,
and introducing an earned income
tax credit. The criteria for comparison are the
labour supply responses, the expected budgetary
cost to the government after taking into account
labour supply responses, the number of
winners and losers from the policy change, the
effects on the distribution of effective marginal
tax rates, and the effects on the number of jobless
households. From the results, it is clear
that the option to reduce taper rates is dominated
by the other options on all criteria. The
other four options each have their advantages
and disadvantages; no option scores best on all
criteria.