Title of article :
A joint marginalized multilevel model for longitudinal outcomes
Author/Authors :
Samuel Iddi&Geert Molenberghs، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
Abstract :
The shared-parameter model and its so-called hierarchical or random-effects extension are widely used joint
modeling approaches for a combination of longitudinal continuous, binary, count, missing, and survival
outcomes that naturally occurs in many clinical and other studies.A random effect is introduced and shared
or allowed to differ between two or more repeated measures or longitudinal outcomes, thereby acting as a
vehicle to capture association between the outcomes in these joint models. It is generally known that parameter
estimates in a linear mixed model (LMM) for continuous repeated measures or longitudinal outcomes
allow for a marginal interpretation, even though a hierarchical formulation is employed. This is not the case
for the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM), that is, for non-Gaussian outcomes. The aforementioned
joint models formulated for continuous and binary or two longitudinal binomial outcomes, using theLMM
and GLMM, will naturally have marginal interpretation for parameters associated with the continuous
outcome but a subject-specific interpretation for the fixed effects parameters relating covariates to binary
outcomes. To derive marginally meaningful parameters for the binary models in a joint model, we adopt the
marginal multilevel model (MMM) due to Heagerty [13] and Heagerty and Zeger [14] and formulate a joint
MMM for two longitudinal responses. This enables to (1) capture association between the two responses
and (2) obtain parameter estimates that have a population-averaged interpretation for both outcomes. The
model is applied to two sets of data. The results are compared with those obtained from the existing
approaches such as generalized estimating equations, GLMM, and the model of Heagerty [13]. Estimates
were found to be very close to those from single analysis per outcome but the joint model yields higher
precision and allows for quantifying the association between outcomes. Parameters were estimated using
maximum likelihood. The model is easy to fit using available tools such as the SAS NLMIXED procedure.
Keywords :
Random-effects model , Generalized estimating equation , Joint model , marginal multilevel model , maximumlikelihoodestimation , Shared-parameter model
Journal title :
JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS
Journal title :
JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS